skip to Main Content
Does The Covid Stimulus Check Or Unemployment Insurance Create A Public Charge Issue?

Does the Covid stimulus check or unemployment insurance create a public charge issue?

As we head together into this time of global crisis, the technicalities of U.S. immigration law may not be the first thing on your mind. But judging from some emails I’ve been getting, many of you are looking ahead to the bright future that we will all share. Bravo! Specifically, some folks have asked the smart question of how certain payments provided during the crisis might impact “public charge” determinations. Could you get in trouble if you accept the stimulus payment or go on unemployment insurance? I believe the answer – fortunately – is that either is okay. Here’s my two cents.

What is “public charge inadmissibility?”

If you’re reading this post you probably have some knowledge of this once-arcane aspect of U.S. immigration law. In short, public charge inadmissibility is the notion that immigrants need to show that they will not be a drain on public resources. In the words of USCIS, they need to demonstrate that they can be self-sufficient.

For a long time, public charge was more or less in the background of U.S. immigration law. That changed, however, under the current administration. The rules have been changed, and a complicated new Form I-944, Declaration of Self Sufficiency is required in most green card cases. This form looks at all sorts of information that is supposed to show whether a green card applicant has the ability to support herself. A big part of that test is whether the person has received public benefits. If you want to do a deep dive into the rule, read my long article here.

Covid stimulus payment.

Under the emergency relief package passed recently by Congress, U.S. taxpayers with income under $75,000 will receive a one-time payment of up to $1,200. The purpose of this payment, of course, is to help families weather the economic devastation wrought by the global pandemic. I have little concern that the stimulus payment will create a public charge problem for green card applicants.

First off, the public benefits that cause negative public charge determinations are specifically defined by law at 8 C.F.R. 212.21(b). The “naughty list” includes means-tested programs like Medicaid and cash assistance. The stimulus payment is not on that list.

More to the point, just think about the very purpose of the stimulus check. The very reason Congress created the stimulus is that it recognized that all American families need some help getting through this crisis (or at least those earning less than $75,000). Receiving the payment doesn’t make a green card applicant dependant on the government, it just means that she is in the same situation as everyone else.

This is not to say that someone who receives the stimulus payment might not have public charge issues for other reasons. Under the new rules, anyone with household income under 250% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines needs to take a careful look at their case. It’s just that the payment itself doesn’t mean the person will fail public charge scrutiny.

Unemployment insurance.

We received a lot of questions about unemployment insurance even before the Covid crisis. In people’s minds, a lot of times this gets lumped together with other money from the government, like cash assistance under TANF. But legally, unemployment insurance is very different. Specifically, it’s insurance. It is insurance that both an employee and an employer have, in effect, purchased from the government. You pay into the plan when employed, and can draw on the policy when uninsured.

Fortunately, USCIS is quite clear on this one. The Form I-944 instructions specifically show that unemployment payments have to be counted as “other income” on the Form.

Especially if your unemployment is caused by the pandemic, receiving those benefits should not create a public charge problem for you.

Stay safe!

You’ve heard it a thousand times, but please stay safe and socially distanced. We will get through this together as a deeply-connected global community. I can’t take care of your 5-year-old or get groceries for you, but if you have questions about how this crisis impacts immigration, ask away.

In solidarity,
Greg McLawsen
Founder & Managing Attorney

Greg McLawsen

I’m proud to be the founder of Sound Immigration. My job is to work behind the scenes to ensure our clients have an outstanding experience at our firm. I’m passionate about reinventing the practice of law to make it work better for those we serve. I work hard to identify the best available technology to make our firm convenient for clients. I look to other industries, like real estate and the restaurant business, to learn about practice that will help serve our clients better.

This Post Has 0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top

We here for you, as always.

Sound Immigration will continue its operations during the Covid crisis. Since our founding, we have operated as a remote, digitally-networked team, so that is nothing new for us.

What is new, of course, is the crisis that confronts the world as a whole. Now is the time to affirm our membership in the interconnected global community. We are proud, as ever, of the role that we as immigration lawyers play in strengthing those global bonds.

Stay strong. Stay socially distanced. We will make it through this together.

In solidarity,
Greg McLawsen
Founder & Managing Attorney