skip to Main Content

Sound Immigration began with a simple but radical idea. We’re not interested in “the way things have always been done.” Instead, we care about what’s best – for our clients and for the lawyers who serve them.

Traditional law firms are bloated with inefficiency and waste. Lawyers spin their wheels using outdated technology and terrible project management skills. Meanwhile, clients are left to talk to support staff, because their lawyer is too busy playing catch-up.

We went in a different direction.

We embrace technology and innovation at every turn. We constantly ask how we can use new tools to improve our client’s experience. We borrow from disciplines like Agile project management and design thinking to challenge the way law is traditionally practiced.

Basically, we built a better law firm.

Our clients work can work seamlessly with their attorney from anywhere in the world.  A client communicates directly with her individual immigration attorney – never with paralegals or support staff. We work at lightening speed to deliver outstanding service in a fraction of the time that other firms may take.

Our latest updates.

Video: Financial Liability Under the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support

This post contains the material for today’s talk given to the family law section of the Texas State Bar Association. Thanks to the renowned Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch, for co-presenting with me. Our talk addressed legal enforcement of the Form I-864, Affidavit…

Video: The Form I-864 & the right to indefinite spousal support

Family law attorneys need to understand that certain immigrants are entitled to financial support far in excess of what would be prescribed by state family law. Under the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support, sponsored immigrants are entitled to indefinite financial…

Who qualifies for financial support under the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support

Certain green card holders are legally entitled to receive financial support from their immigration sponsors. Exactly who qualifies for support? 1 – Did you get your green card through a spouse or family member? The Affidavit of Support is required…

DHS Proposes New Adjudication Standards for Forms I-864 and I-864A

A version of this article will appear in Bender’s Immigration Bulletin. © Greg McLawsen (2020). On October 2, 2020, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposed significant revisions to its regulations governing the Affidavit of Support.[1] The Department had proposed…

In Florida, can you bring an I-864 lawsuit in federal court?

The form I-864, Affidavit of Support is created by federal law. Indeed, the form has been integral to the practice of (federal) immigration law for over twenty years… much longer if you consider the predecessor Affidavits of Support. So if…

How does settlement work in I-864 cases?

Most civil lawsuits end in settlement long before they go to trial. Lawsuits to enforce the I-864 are no different. In our experience, roughly half of I-864 enforcement cases settle before a lawsuit is ever filed, or very shortly after…

Another I-864 claim lost in divorce court – Mullonkal v. Kodiyamplakkil

It is that I have unfortunately observed before. Yet another I-864 beneficiary has lost out on a claim under the I-864 because they tried to do so in state family law court versus federal court. Mullonkal v. Kodiyamplakkil was a…

Beringer v. Beringer – another example of bad I-864 results in state court

Another case, this one in Texas, illustrates the dangers of trying to enforce the Form I-864 in state versus federal court. In Beringer v. Beringer, yet another I-864 beneficiary got less than what she was entitled to under the plan…

U.S. immigration policy and COVID-19

(Updated June 20, 2020). Yesterday I was asked to do a podcast interview about the Supreme Court’s new DACA decision, and on other things that have changed in immigration since COVID-19. So much has happened in the past few months…

The Supreme Court’s DACA Decision – what this means for you and FAQs

Today the Supreme Court made its ruling in DHS v. University of California, addressing the legality of the Trump Administration’s decision to end DACA. No. 18-587, 591 U.S. ___ (2020). In short, the Court held that the Trump Administration acted…

This Post Has 0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top